Another Shaw Production: Anamorphic Adventures in Hong Kong
What did teenage viewers think when Kill Bill: Vol. 1 (2003) opened with the logo for Shawscope? Could they possibly have shared the frisson felt by baby-boomers who had haunted inner-city theatres thirty years before? Or by viewers who had watched “Kung-Fu Theatre” on 1980s television? Or by fanboys like Tarantino, freeze-framing cropped and trembling VHS tapes? For all those generations, the Shawscope blazon opens onto a world of one-armed swordfighters, beautiful woman warriors, and kung-fu masters with very long white eyebrows. Without denying the peculiar pleasures of these sagas, we can peer behind the logo and study this widescreen format’s place in a broader dynamic. The Shaw mystique arose out of creative innovations of the studio’s personnel, guided by the business policies of an all-powerful producer. We can as well analyze how Shaw directors forged a distinct widescreen aesthetic—one that still, as Tarantino seems to realize, has much to teach us about the ways movies can seize spectators. Hong Kong took tutorials in widescreen from its neighbors, but eventually it could offer lessons, and exhilarating ones, to the world.
Movietown and Its Master
At the end of World War II, Hong Kong was in a position to grow from a sleepy port on the South China coast into a capitalist tiger. It enjoyed a deep-water harbor poised between China and the rest of Asia. A well-educated work force operated in an atmosphere of dynamic entrepreneurship. Although ruled by a colonial bureaucracy, citizens were protected by the rule of law and freedom of the press. Unlike its neighbors, it remained a colonial possession, unshaken by civil war and unfettered by dictatorship. England ran the government with an unexpected, possibly unprecedented, lightness of touch, and left the people to make money.
This city that in 1951 held only two million persons turned into East Asia’s cinematic miracle, the biggest regional production center outside Japan. Through the 1950s Hong Kong film companies produced 150 to 200 or more releases annually. This was because the industry served not only the local market but theatres in Singapore, Malaysia, Thailand, Taiwan, South Korea, and Chinatowns in Europe and North America. The films were made in several languages, but two dominated. Mandarin was the principal language of the mainland and of Taiwan, while Cantonese was spoken in southern China, much of the Chinese diaspora, and Hong Kong itself. Thanks to subtitling and dubbing, any film became export-friendly.1
Several Hong Kong-based companies supplied the regional market, but midway through the 1950s, two transnational entertainment firms got serious about expansion. The older of the pair was the Shaw Brothers enterprise. The Shaw family, of Shanghai origins, had been powerful exhibitors and producers in southern China since the 1930s. Wisely stationing their headquarters in Singapore, the several brothers ruled over an international entertainment empire that included movie houses, hotels, bowling alleys, amusement parks, and other leisure businesses. Before the mid-1950s the company was conent to earn money primarily from exhibition and so turn out a dozen or fewer films per year.
Shaws was challenged by another Singapore-based firm, the Cathay Organization. Founded in 1947, it was run by Loke Wan Tho, a Malayan Chinese determined to modernize the East Asian motion picture business.2 He began building comfortable, air-conditioned theatres throughout the region, challenging the Shaw firm on its own territory. To supply his venues with product, Loke took over a bankrupt Hong Kong studio facility and renamed it the Motion Picture & General Investment Co.
The first MP & GI films were released in 1955, and they quickly seized attention. In sharp contrast with the costume pictures and Confucian family dramas that dominated the market, MP & GI’s product embraced American popular culture. Comedies (Our Sister Hedy, 1957), melodramas (Her Tender Heart, 1959), and musicals (Mambo Girl and My Kingdom for a Husband, both 1957) took place in modern urban settings and celebrated pop music and fresh young stars. In 1960, MP & GI turned out thirty films, all in Mandarin.
The Shaws didn’t sit on their hands. The sixth brother, Run Run (Shao Yifu), came to Hong Kong in 1958 to set the studio on a new path. He began by upgrading production values. Several studios were producing color films occasionally, but Run Run made color a main attraction. Shaws’ opulent, song-filled costume romances Diao Charn (1958) and The Kingdom and the Beauty (1959) attracted international attention, winning several prizes at the Asian Film Festival. By 1962 Shaw productions would shift wholly to color production, a policy that set it apart from other firms. At the same period Run Run oversaw the construction of a massive production facility, Movietown, on picturesque Clearwater Bay. Opened in 1961, this film factory—no other word will do—boasted 1200 employees, six sound stages, and three dubbing studios. Movietown ran around the clock, with staff working staggered ten-hour shifts. Several hundred employees were housed in dormitories in the compound. A few years later Shaws added six more stages and a color processing laboratory.3
As part of his retooling of production values, Run Run Shaw embraced widescreen cinema. Although at least one anamorphic film had been made in Hong Kong in the 1950s,4 no studio had embraced the format. As another thrust against MP & GI, Run Run took steps to introduce anamorphic production. Instead of turning to American sources, he looked to a nearer neighbor.
The Japanese Connection
Shaws had already developed some ties to Japan, most steadily in the firm’s reliance on Tokyo’s Far East Film Laboratory for post-production work. Shaws occasionally collaborated with Japanese production firms too, notably on coproductions like Princess Yang Kwei Fei (1955, with Daiei) and Madame White Snake (1956, with Toho).
Shaws found its crucial ally in cinematographer Nishimoto Tadashi. After starting his career in Manchuria during the war, Nishimoto worked at the Shintoho studio and served as assistant director on Japan’s first anamorphic widescreen film, The Meiji Emperor and the Great Russo-Japanese War (1957). He worked for Shaws on Love with an Alien (1958), a coproduction with Korea, and shot a second picture for the firm, Lady of Mystery (1958). After returning to Japan to film two anamorphic horror classics for Nakagawa Nobuo (Black Cat Mansion, 1958, and Ghost of Yotsuya, 1958), he made a long-term commitment to Shaws.
Under his adopted Chinese name He Lanshan, Nishimoto became a central force at Movietown. He filmed the big-budget costume pictures of Shaws’ premiere director, Li Han-hsiang: Yang Kwei Fei (1962); Empress Wu Tse-tien (1963); and Beyond the Great Wall (1964). Nishimoto shot the most prestigious production of the period, The Love Eterne (1963), and he worked on significant films during the decade, including King Hu’s breakthrough Come Drink with Me (1966) and the melodrama The Blue and the Black (1966). He also shot more routine musicals, spy thrillers, and sex films.
Nishimoto convinced Shaws of the value of Japanese craftsmanship. It was after his arrival that the firm began sending its personnel to Japan to observe routines at the major studios, and Shaws hired Toho’s special-effects department to help on The Love Eterne. Most important from our perspective here, Nishimoto took Shaws into the widescreen era. With Toho’s cooperation, he brought Tohoscope equipment to Hong Kong, and he instructed cinematographers in methods of filming in the anamorphic format.5 Nishimoto shot the studio’s earliest anamorphic release, Les Belles (1961), and nearly all of his later films were in the format.
While MP & GI was slow to adopt color and widescreen, these technical innovations became central to the newly-outfitted Movietown. But Shaws’ commitment to showcasing these attractions slowed down production. The firm had released over thirty titles in 1960, pre-Shawscope, but soon annual output fell to around twenty. A big costume film might take two years to shoot, especially since Nishimoto was often dividing his efforts among several projects simultaneously.
In 1964, Loke Wan Tho and other Cathay executives died in a plane crash, and MP & GI began to flounder. Given a chance to seize the market, Run Run Shaw determined to ramp up output. He needed directors who could turn out films quickly. To supplement the studio’s contract directors, Nishimoto helped Shaws secure the services of the prolific Japanese director Inoue Umetsugu. Inoue is said to have signed a contract calling for him to make a hundred films at Shaws. He didn’t fulfill his quota, but he did sign seventeen releases from 1967 to 1971.6 Soon after Inoue came aboard, Shaws hired five more Japanese directors: Furukawa Takumi, Nakahira Koh, Shima Koji, Murayama Mitsuo, and Matsuo Akinori.7 All were respected as speedy and efficient directors, but they weren’t mere journeymen. They came from major studios, several had worked under esteemed masters like Kurosawa, and one, Nakahira Koh, had made a scandalous success with Crazed Fruit (1956), a portrayal of reckless upper-class youth. Shaws did not trade on the directors’ reputations, however; all but Inoue worked under Chinese names.
From 1967 to 1972, the six émigrés shot over thirty films. They often brought with them their cinematographers, lighting staff, choreographers, and performers, so several interpreters had to be on the set. Although some directors had worked on swordplay films and costume pictures at home, none were entrusted with such projects at Shaws. Instead, they often simply remade the musicals and thrillers they had shot in Japan. “The Japanese versions were usually of higher quality,” producer Chua Lam recalled, “as the aim of the Hong Kong versions was not to surpass but to copy.”8 Sometimes the copying was utterly literal, as in Nakahira Koh’s recycling of a shot from Crazed Fruit (1956) in the Shaw production Summer Heat (1968).
Despite the tendency toward replication, historians have pointed out that this “Japanese Whirlwind” brought a new energy to the Shaw product, pushing the studio toward a more cosmopolitan style, more urban subjects, and younger stars. I’ll try to show a little later that the émigrés also provided some distinctively Japanese approaches to anamorphic filming.
Thanks partly to the burst of new directing talent, Shaws bumped its output up to forty-two releases in 1967, and steadied at around thirty per year afterward. By 1970 MP & GI, renamed Cathay after Loke’s death, was a spent force. Shaws dominated the market. Every Shaw release announced its dominance with a swaggering prelude. A blast of trumpets and drums accompanied the studio’s logo (a shield swiped from another band of brothers, the Warners). Then came the announcement that the picture was in Shawscope, the name stretched across a double-flared design reminiscent of U.S. anamorphic advertisements. Here is an early variant, soon supplanted by the more familiar design centered on the Brothers’ shield.
At the movie’s close, along with the end credit, came the proud phrase, “Another Shaw Production.”
Genres and Styles
Arriving late to the anamorphic competition, some seven years after the process was introduced in the U.S., Shaws had a choice of equipment. Like most non-U.S. systems, Shawscope didn’t rely on the technology developed by Bausch & Lomb for Twentieth Century-Fox’s CinemaScope. Nor did it adopt Panavision, which had yet to be available in the region. Charles Wang Cheung Tze, whose firm supplied equipment to the studios at the time, recalls that Hong Kong filmmakers used versions of both Dyaliscope and Kowa-based lens systems.9
The French Dyaliscope system improved the Fox format by offering a variety of anamorphosers matched to the focal length of each prime lens. This assured a more constant squeeze across the visual field.10 Alternatively, the anamorphosers provided by Japan’s Kowa optics company formed the basis of several systems, including Tohoscope. Japanese filmmakers placed the Kowa lenses not in front of the prime lens, as with CinemaScope, but behind it.11 This arrangement enabled filmmakers to use as a prime lens a 10:1 zoom, which yielded a great range of focal lengths.12 As a result Kurosawa and his peers could mount bold wide-angle and telephoto shots at a time when American filmmakers had difficulty creating such imagery with CinemaScope.13
A characteristic early example of Japanese anamorphic, from Masumura Yasuzo’s Giants and Toys (1958).
The long lens captures a fight in Kurosawa’s Yojimbo (1961).
According to Nishimoto, Shawscope was based on Tohoscope, although Dyaliscope lenses were probably also used on Shaw productions. By relying on these anamorphic processes, Shaw films could exploit variable focal length in the Japanese manner. Here’s a telephoto frame from the first Shawscope release, Les Belles (1961).
As in other countries, certain genres became favored vehicles for the anamorphic process. Going into the 1960s, the studio’s most prestigious genre was the huangmei diao, the “yellow plum opera.” The films were costume pictures set in a vague past, with most scenes partially sung. Often focusing on forbidden love between aristocrats and commoners, the films drew upon traditional theatre, most notably when male protagonists were played by female stars. The music, however, was far from traditional, using more modern tonal scales and singing styles. The cycle was launched by The Heavenly Match (1955), a film from mainland China that proved a major hit. Shaws followed with the prestigious pair Diau Charn (1957) and The Kingdom and the Beauty (1958). The genre elevated many Shaws performers to stardom, such as Linda Lin Dai, Betty Loh Ti, and Ivy Ling Po. Most scholars regard The Love Eterne (1963), a Shawscope production, as the epitome of the cycle, but fairly soon the genre fell out of popularity.14
It took some time, however, for the huangmei films to appear in the splendor of Shawscope. Nishimoto Tadashi’s first effort in the genre, The Empress Wu Tse-tien (1963), was in production for two years. So the new format was premiered in other genres. One was the wenyi film, or melodrama. Shaws had rarely indulged in pure melodrama, but when Doe Ching, an eminent MP & GI director, was lured away to Shaws, he was allowed to work in that vein. The melancholy Love without End (1961) illustrates how smoothly the female stars nurtured at Shaws could be integrated into the wenyi film. Love without End and other wenyi were filmed in black and white, but eventually the genre made the transition to color, with the title sometimes trading on the process (Pink Tears, 1965; The Rainbow, 1968). Like the huangmei film, the wenyi cycle wound down in the late 1960s.15
While appealing to traditional tastes in the opera and wenyi films, Shaws also pursued the young audience. MP & GI had pointed the way already: My Kingdom for a Husband (1957) and Calendar Girl (1958) showed that modern musicals with Westernized pop scores could succeed in the regional market.16 Armed with color and widescreen, Shaw Brothers launched a cycle of cosmopolitan show-business movies centering on young performers, among them Les Belles, Love Parade (1963), The Dancing Millionairess (1964), and Till the End of Time (1966). Like the huangmei films, the musicals wrapped their slim romantic plotlines in grandiose sets, sumptuous costumes, and melodies that could become hits. It was this genre that Inoue Umetsugu was imported to invigorate in Hong Kong Nocturne (1967), Hong Kong Rhapsody (1968), The Millionaire Chase (1969), and many more titles, some adapted from Japanese musicals.
If we consider what Western countries were doing with widescreen in the mid-1960s, the visual approach taken in these films can look either naïve or charmingly anachronistic. For these genres, directors developed a sort of plain-vanilla approach to Scope.17 Usually the camera adopts a horizontal and level framing. Figures are arrayed in rows or scattered in moderate depth, although occasionally a large set permits grand diagonals.
Clothesline staging in Love without End (1961).
Eavesdropping in depth (The Bride Napping, 1962).
The Shaw touch: An immense set and diagonal composition for The Love Eterne (1963).
Standard analytical editing, favoring over-the-shoulder shots and moderate close-ups, is the default method of handling conversation scenes. We sometimes find aperture framing or a veiling of distant action, especially in the diaphanous curtains favored in the costume pictures.
Empress Wu Tse-tin (1963): aperture framing and veiled sets.
The cutting rate is moderate to slow; in the films I’ve examined, the average shot length runs between eight and seventeen seconds. This approach to Scope threw the emphasis on Movietown’s strengths: costume and set design, with vibrant colors coordinated across the acreage of the frame.
Technical factors also favored keeping the cinematography simple. Nishimoto recalled that the Tohoscope lenses couldn’t give very accurate focus. To judge by the onscreen evidence, focus was particularly difficult at the extremes of zoom lenses. In the 1960s, filmmakers seem to have favored wide-angle lenses, even at the cost of bowed verticals. Nishimoto also claims to have typically shot the color films at an aperture of f5.6 on film with an ASA/ISO rating of 50, both factors which would also minimize depth of field.18
Nevertheless, compared with the Japanese anamorphic films of the time, especially those in black and white, the Shaw approach to its in-house genres seems quite conservative. The huangmei and wenyi films are treated with a pictorial solemnity that befits their echt-old-country atmosphere and conservative morality. The primary exception to my generalization about these genres comes in Inoue’s musicals, from Hong Kong Nocturne (1967) onward. The musical numbers and montage sequences tend to be somewhat more dynamic than the ones we find in the early 1960s. Inoue decorates some passages with canted framings and off-center compositions.
A canted angle for a discovery scene in the musical Hong Kong Rhapsody (1968).
Even the straightforward scenes tend to rely more on low angles, more outré visual effects, and staging in depth, even if not all planes can be well-focused. In these ways Inoue’s visual style leans a bit toward the prototypical Japanese use of anamorphic widescreen, which tends to be more varied and flashy than that elsewhere in Asia, or indeed in Western countries.
A distinctively Japanese treatment of widescreen, then, was imported to Hong Kong but toned down. The process is apparent in another genre that emerged in the mid-1960s, the spy film. The Japanese had already begun imitating the James Bond series when Hong Kong studios followed suit with The Golden Buddha (1966) and Angel with the Iron Fists (1967). Two early entries in the cycle, The Black Falcon (1967) and Interpol 009 (1967) were made by the imported Japanese directors Furukawa Takumi and Nakahira Koh, both leaning heavily on their hits back home. Other spy adventures followed, from MP & GI and other studios as well as from Shaws. As the cycle faded, Shaws’ émigré directors moved toward the crime thriller, in such films as Diary of a Lady-Killer (Nakahira, 1969), A Cause to Kill (Murayama Mitsuo, 1970), and The Lady Professional (Akinori Matsuo, 1971).
Again, the mise-en-scène of these genres gets the inflated Movietown treatment, at once lavish and tacky. The cavernous lairs of Mabuse-like villains are rendered as vast sets, brilliantly lit and throbbing with saturated primary colors. These master criminals worry more about interior decoration than world domination.
Angel with the Iron Fists (1967): A huge Movietown set becomes a master criminal’s headquarters.
Compared with the other genres I’ve mentioned, though, the spy films and thrillers tend to have flashier camerawork. They take advantage of Run Run Shaw’s decision during the building of Movietown to rely on post-dubbing rather than direct sound. Freed from worrying about microphone placement, the director gains flexibility of camera position. In the Japanese émigrés’ films, entire scenes may be handled in low angles, and many shots offer canted framings. The compositions often make bold use of architecture, slicing the visual field into modules and spreading the action out to the very edges of the frame.
Partitional framing in The Black Falcon (1967).
Black Falcon: Extreme edge framing for suspense in the anamorphic format.
In particular, the Japanese fondness for partially blocked action, what I’ve called elsewhere a “game of vision” that teases us with important story information shifting in and out of visibility, is occasionally seen in the spy films as well.19 In addition, the cutting in these genres tends to be somewhat more rapid than in the costume pictures and musicals, with average shot lengths in the five- to seven-second range.
Three examples suggest the ingenuity that occasionally emerges from these formula pieces. In Interpol 009 (1967), Nakahira Koh creates a game of vision when agent 009 is jailed. The other prisoners are clustered around him in the middle distance, leaving a gap that reveals his face.
As the men pull a bit away from him, they open up an area in the distance that a guard can step into, summoning the hero to leave.
Instead of cutting, Nakahira sustains the shot by having the agent leave the cell, bidding farewell to the others from a tiny slice of space in the distance.
As Japanese directors often do, Nakahira has pulled the action into ever-smaller zones of depth and obliged us to follow slight changes within quasi-geometrical patterns.
Murayama’s A Cause to Kill (1970) centers on a woman who sets up her cheating husband to be murdered, only to find that the husband has killed the hitman. It is a frank plagiarism of Dial M for Murder, complete with a cunning police inspector and byplay with latchkeys. It’s also strongly Japanese in its stylization, from abstractly composed high angles to aggressive foreground planes.
A parking lot becomes a geometrical pattern (A Cause to Kill).
A telltale briefcase looms in front of us while characters argue in the distance.
A florid game with a lampshade suggests that Murayama had been watching The Ipcress File (or maybe Godard’s Contempt).
One of the most striking flourishes comes when the accused man’s lover is shown sitting down in the bedroom while the cop checks the wife’s handbag for the latchkey. An off-center shot of the lover sitting down by a chair is abruptly cut off by a stark close-up in which the handbag occupies the chair’s spot and the detective lunges forward to seize it.
Achieving this sort of visual accent through tight framing and graphically matched cutting is common across the history of Japanese cinema and is quite unlike what we find in most Shaw productions, even other spy films made by Chinese filmmakers.
The same sort of stylization emerges in the set-pieces of The Lady Professional (1971). By now, it’s apparent, directors had the continuously variable focal lengths afforded by zoom lenses, and director Akinori embraces extremes of rack-focus and distortion to achieve shock effects. We watch a bowling match from inside the pin array: The player rolls the ball and we shift focus to a huge close-up of a pin before it falls over.
A dying man flails at the camera, his hand enlarged out of all measure.
A killing at the bowling alley is rendered in an even more bizarre way. Offscreen the bowler is shot, and blood drips onto the electronic scoreboard.
We then get a huge close-up of the bloodstain spreading on the scoring panel.
Cut to a shot of the victim slumping as a woman shrieks; the composition makes the violence hard to detect.
He falls forward dead, into a grotesquely distended close-up.
This last shot seems to have been filmed in the 1.33 format and printed in anamorphic proportions!
Just as the huangmei and wenyi genres motivated a solemn approach to cinematography, the suspense and violence of thrillers justify an exaggerated treatment, along with some startling experimentation. But I’d argue that the most vigorous innovations occurred in another genre that, retooled in the mid-1960s, pushed the others out of the spotlight.
“Shaws Launches ‘Action Era,’” read the headline in the October 1965 issue of Southern Screen, the studio’s publicity magazine. The story explained that the company was developing a new approach to the wuxia pian, the “film of heroic chivalry.” Films featuring knights errant and vigorous swordplay had been a mainstay of Chinese cinema since the silent era. During the 1950s Hong Kong’s Cantonese-language companies had found a ready audience for their fantasy wuxia pian. Here warriors both male and female battled monsters, sought hidden treasure, dabbled in black magic, and displayed astonishing fighting skills, including flying. Cantonese cinema also developed the kung-fu film, most prominently in the lengthy series centering on the martial artist Wong Fei-hung. In the kung-fu stories, the fighters were often shot with rather static and distant coverage. Shaws’ proclamation set its Mandarin-language product squarely against both the fantasy swordplay film and the kung-fu films. The Southern Screen publicity article defined the new trend as a “progressive movement.” “It breaks with the conventional stagy shooting methods and introduces new techniques to attain a higher level of realism, particularly in the fighting sequences.”20
Shaws’ initial offerings in fall of 1965, Hsu Tseng-hung’s Temple of the Red Lotus and The Twin Swords, did not trigger an overwhelming response, but the films of early 1966 did. Chang Cheh’s Tiger Boy was followed quickly by King Hu’s Come Drink with Me, which became one of the top-grossing Shaw titles of the year. In 1967, Shaws released eleven wuxia pian, including Chang Cheh’s huge hit The One-Armed Swordsman. By 1970, swordplay films were the mainstay of the studio’s output. The rise of the wuxia film probably accelerated the decline of the other genres, particularly the huangmei and wenyi pictures. These had cultivated women stars, but Chang Cheh began pushing for “masculine” genres that would build up a stable of male actors. Soon the studio would be identified with a string of stars—Jimmy Wang Yu, David Chiang, Ti Lung, and Alexander Fu Sheng—all of whom worked with Chang Cheh.
Shaws’ new wuxia pian weren’t utterly original. Multi-volume martial arts novels had long been a staple of Chinese popular fiction, and a new wave of writers, led by Jin Yong, had recently begun publishing earthier, more violent sagas. The new wuxia novels were inspiring Cantonese and Mandarin filmmakers to rethink swordplay cinema when Shaws launched its Action Era.21 Perhaps the most noteworthy competitor to the Shaws initiative was The Jade Bow (1965), from the Great Wall studio. In addition, imported Japanese swordplay films exercised a powerful influence over all companies. Shaws distributed swordplay films from the Toei studio and the Zatoichi series from Daiei, and Run Run Shaw screened these imports for his staff to study. The marketing muscle of Shaw Brothers assured that its wuxia cycle played the prime role in renewing the local martial arts film tradition.
As we would expect, the most dynamic stylistic innovations arose in response to the genre’s demand for vigorous action sequences. At one level, Shawscope encouraged directors to dwell on intra-shot effects, staging the principal moves within a single take. Often the influence of Japanese cinema is apparent.
Consider what we might call the one-by-one tracking shot. This follows a fighter encountering and eliminating a string of opponents, each of whom plunges into and falls out of the frame at the right moment. This tightly choreographed camera movement is rare in Cantonese martial arts films of the 1950s but is common in Japanese swordplay films. Used extensively in Come Drink with Me and other Shaw films, the one-by-one tracking shot seems a clear effort to make the action scenes less stagy.22 Similarly, the low-angle shots that we find in the Shaw films of the Japanese émigrés seem to have inspired the wuxia directors. Chang Cheh found such framings “warm” (as opposed to “cold” high angles) and he recalled that “passionate, spirited ‘new school’ directors used a lot of (extremely) low-angle shots. Directors of my generation were often mocked for ‘having the cinematographer crawl on the ground all the time.’”23 Chang experimented with shooting most scenes of The Assassin (1967) in static low-angle framings, some quite boldly composed.24
Other stylistic strategies of Japanese swordplay films were smoothly assimilated to Shawscope. Swordsmen who have been dealt a lethal cut stand for a time before eventually collapsing. Fighters are configured in various degrees of depth, as in this shot from The One-Armed Swordsman (1967).
Warriors swap places in the course of a shot, or leap in from offscreen, or turn to reveal wounds as they fall out of the foreground. Likewise, Shaw directors borrowed the Japanese device of blocked views. Sometimes figures will flash through the foreground, quite close to the camera, creating a flickering view of the action. In Chor Yuen’s Intimate Confessions of a Chinese Courtesan (1972), the attack on a figure in a cart…
…is interrupted by figures flitting through the foreground…
…giving an extra weight to the blow we finally see.
Yet the influence of Japanese cinema wasn’t all-encompassing. The local directors seemed to have avoided many of the most obvious features of Japanese technique, such as the densely composed frames and free panning shots of Kurosawa’s Yojimbo (1961) and Sanjuro (1962). Many of the swordplay films make use of the gigantic sets and colorful costume design that were associated with the Shawscope product, as in the climactic fight in The Assassin.
As we’ve seen, the émigré directors, even though they had worked on period swordplay films in Japan, were not assigned wuxia projects, so local directors had an opportunity to create something distinctive.
There are as well important differences in the national martial-arts traditions. Japanese sword art (kenjutsu) emphasizes the power of the single stroke. There is an entire division of technique (iaido, or iai-jutsu) devoted solely to drawing the sword and cutting the adversary in one movement. Prolonged sparring with each opponent is less significant that finding the precise moment to thrust or slash. As a result, Japanese swordplay films tend to emphasize the long buildup to the decisive stroke. This idea forms the basis of the famous final scene of Sanjuro, a suspenseful, nearly unmoving face-off that is resolved in an instant.
A similar emphasis on the sudden stroke can sometimes be found in Shaw films of the late 1960s, but most often the heavier swords, spears, and other weapons of the Chinese martial arts traditions favor extended fights. These scenes are filled with thrusts, parries, feints, and evasive maneuvers. In Have Sword Will Travel (1969), the final fight runs for over twenty minutes. The convention of prolonged combat carries over to the kung-fu film, in which two fighters may battle at exhausting length. To cover such extended action in single shots would require long and intricate takes, so Hong Kong martial arts films gravitated toward cutting. The complicated leaps, twists, and stratagems are much easier to present in several shots. Just as important, the sustained combat creates its own rhythm, which can be amplified or quickened by the editing pace.
So orchestrating shot-to-shot relations became central to the wuxia pian. Many of the 1960s swordplay films are cut reasonably fast, with average shot lengths in the 5- to 6-second range, and some are swiftly paced, such as The Temple of the Red Lotus (3.6 seconds ASL). As in other genres, the default is analytical editing, with master shots broken into closer views. It seems, though, that Shaws encouraged directors to use quite close views of individual fighters, some lunging to the camera, others reacting abruptly to a blow. Typical of this tendency is what we might call the fatal insert, in which a very brief close-up of the blade inflicting the wound interrupts full shots of the fighters. Breaking down a fight into details this way was at variance with the distant coverage of fights in the Wong Fei-hung films.
Along with analytical editing Shaw directors relied on constructive editing. Here no master shot supplies a full view of the action; the viewer must build up a sense what’s happening from bits of adjacent spaces. This is of course common in many traditions, including the Hollywood western. (Shot A shows hero firing/shot B shows bushwhacker being hit.) But constructive editing is particularly important in Hong Kong cinema because it solves a problem that Japanese directors didn’t face.
Chinese traditions of martial arts include certain techniques which are rather difficult to represent on film. Even outside the fantasy swordplay tales, fighters execute quasi-supernatural feats of strength or grace. The obvious instance is the “weightless leap.” Heroes vault into the air, sometimes sustaining themselves aloft for quite a while. How can the film represent this? It’s hard to convey in a single shot, though early Chinese directors used crude superimpositions to suggest it. Today’s equivalent is the sort of CGI imagery we find in Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon (2000), Hero (2002), and their successors. In pre-digital days, the flying swordsman could be lifted on thin wires, another technique that filmmakers seem to have borrowed from Japan.25 More commonly, weightless leaps were created out of constructive editing. A fighter is shown springing up in the first shot, flying in the second, and landing in the third. By breaking the event into chunks, the weightless leap could be made clear, and although audiences probably sensed the artifice involved, if the cutting were fast enough, the sequence could pass muster.
In these ways, Shaw directors adapted analytical and constructive editing to the demands of swordplay films. But the wuxia directors enhanced the conventions that they received. Elsewhere I’ve argued that the martial-arts film was Hong Kong’s greatest collective contribution to the aesthetics of film, as historically important as Soviet Montage, German Expressionism, and other stylistic schools.26 Without any knowledge of European avant-garde movements, the Hong Kong directors intuitively discovered fresh and forceful approaches to rendering movement. They merged indigenous practices of theatre and martial arts with principles of international “film language” to create an expressive, visceral cinema. You don’t have to be Quentin Tarantino to recognize that the Shaw studio created a tradition of uniquely arousing filmmaking.
What sorts of innovations do we find? For one thing, more than their peers in other Movietown genres the wuxia directors used editing to create dynamic graphic patterns. In the huangmei and musical films the rich costumes tend to be part of a static array, dotted across the wide format. The martial-arts films put the colors into motion, flashing costumes past us in bold patterns. Thus in one scene of Golden Swallow, each fighter challenging Silver Roc wears a different shade, and the combat that results presents a swirl of color, with his white outfit clashing with the orange, brown, black, gray, and red costumes of his adversaries.
The visceral impact of color is nowhere more apparent than in the use of blood. It becomes vibrant red dabs, blots, and smears on any costume, and can tint any scene. In The One-Armed Swordsman, when our hero contemplates a knife, it picks up the reflection of a red fabric nearby and glints as a bloody blade. More outrageously, the blood can fill the Shawscope screen. One of the most remarkable films of the cycle, Cheng Kang’s 14 Amazons (1972), delivers a stunning climax. The widows have tracked down the men who have killed their husbands, and one woman warrior is battling the principal villain. She slashes frantically at him and a jet of blood bursts across the frame.
Outrageously stylized, even cartoonish, the shot has the impact of a blow to the spectator’s eye.
Sometimes the rapid cutting takes on bold rhythmic patterns. The best example I’ve found comes in King Hu’s application of what Eisenstein calls metric editing. A battle scene in Come Drink with Me is designed and cut according to an arithmetical principle. In medium-shot, Golden Swallow starts to run to the right (30 frames).
In another medium shot one opponent runs toward her (10 frames).
Another opponent runs toward her (10 frames).
Another medium shot: A third opponent runs to the camera, also in 10 frames.
In a climactic medium-shot, all three clash in a 12-frame shot.
It’s as if the initial thirty-frame shot has been splintered into three equal follow-ups, the whole capped by a slightly more sustained shot. The effect is to arrest our attention and create a series of percussive accents that initiate the more sustained combat.
Some of King Hu’s wilder experiments were launched after he left Shaws to make films in Taiwan,27 but other scenes in Come Drink with Me reveal one of his most original extensions of editing principles. How, he asks in effect, can one show the strength of warriors without either using special effects in the full shot or resorting to the roundabout artifice of constructive editing? His answer is to modify analytical cutting in ways that grant power and authority to his heroes.
Take the premise that fighters can concentrate their chi and expel it, in pressurized form, into a single blow from the palm. How to present this? Outside a temple, Golden Swallow smacks an opponent open-handed, and in the next shot the man is already reeling away several feet from her.
She meets her match in the abbot, who applies the same technique to her.
Drawing on the master-shot/closer view schema, King Hu creates jolting ellipses that must be read as powerful blows. The smack takes place in the cut itself, and the Shawscope format amplifies its force by extending the distance across which the figure can be flung.
Probably the most notorious stylistic device of Hong Kong swordplay films is the crashing zoom. In his script for Kill Bill, Tarantino wrote: “We do a Shaw Brothers-style quick zoom into a cu of her face.”28 Perhaps because of the uncertain focus available with the Kowa lenses, zoom shots are fairly rare at the start of the wuxia cycle. When they do crop up, they’re more common in moments of confrontation or dialogue than in fight scenes. In Golden Swallow, when Silver Roc and Golden Whip face off in an inn, there is an abrupt zoom past the men to show the heroine arriving in the distance.
By 1968, though, filmmakers were integrating zoom shots into combat scenes in ways that enhance editing choices. The aim, it seems, is less to zoom in the middle of a shot than to use the zoom to underscore the shot’s beginning or end. A fight in Yen Chun’s That Fiery Girl (1968) employs several of the tactics I’ve already mentioned—the low angle, the fighters who break our view by flitting through the foreground—but it is launched by a framing that starts on an adversary and zooms back as he hurls himself on the hero.
Directors went on to refine the device, exploiting the zoom’s power to accentuate pauses in the action and to blend with the match-on-action cut. In the 1970s, Shaw directors would commonly end a shot with a zoom in to an object or a gesture, then cut to a new angle on the action, sometimes zooming out from the same item. The effect is again to fit the smash zoom to the fight’s pattern of blows and pauses, but at a finer-grained level. In Blood Brothers (1973) Chang Cheh begins and ends his shot with symmetrical zooms centering on a sword.
In all, Shaw Brothers’ wuxia directors imaginatively transformed the conventions that they inherited from Japanese and western cinema. Less statuesque than the huangmei films, less inclined to one-off flourishes than the musicals and thrillers, the swordplay films fused movement, color, cutting, and the plastic zoom into a rousing widescreen style. The result was a rich legacy, developed both in the Hong Kong studio and elsewhere.
Chang Cheh continued to experiment, never losing sight of how Shawscope could extend the visceral power of combat. By the mid-1970s he was employing fast cutting, tight close-ups of faces and hands, and virtuoso shots that combined panning, tracking, zooming, and rack focus. Likewise, Lau Kar-leung, one of Chang’s principal choreographers, started directing in 1975, and he developed the Shaw innovations. Drawing on martial-arts traditions throughout East Asia, Lau mounted fight sequences of unprecedented intricacy, using the resources of thrusting movement, turbulent color, pulsating cutting, and the precision zoom. He makes every bit of the widescreen format a potential arena of combat. In Return to the 36th Chamber of Shaolin (1980), the hero rushes toward an adversary and his movement is captured in an abrupt zoom back.
He lifts his opponent’s arm and punches his chest, creating a focal point on the far left of the anamorphic frame.
As he struggles, another fighter pops into the space cleared by the two figures’ action.
And soon that second opponent slips out from the first one’s armpit and takes on our hero.
This sense of “all-over” shot design is seen in less frantic moments as well. When Lau’s fights pause, his compositions snick securely into place on the wide screen. Below are paused moments from Heroes of the East (1979; aka Shaolin Challenges Ninja) and Legendary Weapons of China (1982).
While Spielberg, Lucas, De Palma, Carpenter, Hill, and other young American directors were rediscovering the kinetic arousal of silent-cinema technique, the Shaw filmmakers were doing much the same, and more inventively.
Outside the studio, the Shaw heritage was developed by King Hu in his Taiwanese productions and by the younger Hong Kong directors (Sammo Hung, Yuen Woo Ping) who emerged in the 1970s. Competing firms not only imitated Shaws but also pushed beyond them, as for instance in Chia Chuang’s remarkable Redress (1969), for the Wing Kun studio. Cathay, Shaws’ old rival, was on its last legs when it drafted Wang Xinglei, a Taiwanese director, to make a big-budget wuxia entry, Escort over Tiger Hills (1969). It betrays the strong influence of Shaw directors, especially King Hu, but it also moves in several new directions. Wang tries a little of everything—slow motion, zooms, superimpositions, color tints, single-frame shots, and jump cuts. The freedom of camera angle in the fights is even greater than in the Movietown product.
At the climax, an astonishing montage stretches a warrior’s fall across five shots in a manner that recalls the Eisenstein of Strike and Battleship Potemkin.29
Scenes such as this offer decisive evidence that the Asian martial arts film of the 1960s and 1970s provided a more venturesome, exhilarating use of the anamorphic format than we can find in virtually any other national cinema of the period.
Run Run Shaw, his Japanese creative personnel, and the directors who launched the Action Era all laid the foundations of the modern Chinese martial arts film. Shawscope helped the studio upgrade and refine its genres, surpass the competition, and establish the company as the premiere Asian source of filmed entertainment. Yet as often happens in fast-changing Hong Kong, Shaws’ reign was short-lived. In 1970, Raymond Chow, Run Run’s chief lieutenant, broke away and with his assistant Leonard Ho founded the Golden Harvest company. Thanks to the success of Bruce Lee’s Big Boss (1971) and the followup films, Chow’s studio quickly captured box-office supremacy. Through the 1970s and the early 1980s, Lee, Michael Hui, Sammo Hung, Jackie Chan, and other stars personified Golden Harvest’s formula of kung-fu action and satiric comedy. Even Nishimoto switched to the winning team, leaving Shaws to shoot Lee’s The Way of the Dragon (1972) and Hui’s Games Gamblers Play (1974).30
Over these years Shaws’ swordplay and kung-fu continued to dominate the studio’s output, while the rest devolved into bumptious comedies and sensational erotica. Run Run Shaw invested in several western productions, notably Taipan (1974), Meteor (1978), and Blade Runner (1982). Losing market share to Golden Harvest and other rivals, the studio curtailed film production in 1985. Movietown became chiefly devoted to shooting television series for Run Run’s local channel, TVB.31
By then, anamorphic widescreen production had begun to tail off across the territory, not to be revived until the 1990s. Nevertheless, Shawscope had introduced other countries of East Asia to the format, and producers in Taiwan and Korea sought to give their films that extra production value associated with the Shawscope logo.32 (Young filmmakers across the region, such as those in the New Taiwanese Cinema, would later reject the wide format as a gesture of rebellion against popular cinema.) At a more fundamental level, Movietown’s contribution to the art of widescreen cinema was registered in the look and feel of all the action pictures that crowded world screens in the boom years of the 1980s and 1990s. John Woo, assistant director to Chang Cheh, never concealed his debt to his mentor. Well before Kill Bill, Tsui Hark had crafted homages to Shaw Brothers’ golden age in Once upon a Time in China (1991) and The Blade (1995). Shawscope helped Hong Kong filmmakers forge, if not a wholly new film language, a robust and exuberant dialect.
For assistance on this essay, I am grateful to Darrell Davis, Emilie Yeh Yueh-yu, Stephanie Ng, Sam Ho, Casey Lee, Stephen Teo, and the late Charles Wang Cheung Tze, of Salon Films, Hong Kong.
1 : The most comprehensive study of Hong Kong film history of this period remains Stephen Teo, Hong Kong Cinema: The Extra Dimensions (London: British Film Institute, 1997).
2 : Poshek Fu, “Hong Kong and Singapore: A History of the Cathay Cinema,” in The Cathay Story, ed. Wong Ain-ling (Hong Kong: Hong Kong Film Archive, 2002), 66–70.
3 : For a survey of Shaw Brothers’ development during the period, see Poshek Fu, “Going Global: A Cultural History of the Shaw Brothers Studio, 1960–1970,” in Border Crossings in Hong Kong Cinema, ed. Law Kar (Hong Kong: Leisure and Cultural Services Department/ Hong Kong International Film Festival, 2000), 43–51.
4 : The film was Mulan, the Girl Who Went to War (Guojia company, 1957). See Hong Kong Filmography vol. IV: 1953-1959 (Hong Kong: Hong Kong Film Archive, 2003), 226.
5 : See Han Yanli, “Japanese Cinematographer Nishimoto Tadashi’s Hong Kong Romance,” Hong Kong Film Archive Newsletter no. 32 (May 2005), 13-14. Nishimoto’s recollections are presented in a book-length interview in Japanese: Nishimoto Tadashi, Yamada Koichi, and Yamane Sadao, Honken e no michi: Nakagawa Nobuo kara Burusu Rie [The Road to Hong Kong: From Nakagawa Nobuo to Bruce Lee] (Tokyo: Chikumashobo, 204). He discusses the development of Shawscope on pp. 114–120.
6 : For a detailed account of Inoue’s years at Shaw Brothers, see Darrell Davis and Emilie Yeh Yueh-yu, “Inoue at Shaws: The Wellspring of Youth,” in The Shaw Screen: A Preliminary Study, ed. Wong Ain-ling (Hong Kong: Hong Kong Film Archive, 2003), 255–271, as well as the biographical entry in same volume, 318–319.
7 : See Kinnia Yau Shuk-ting, “Hong Kong and Japan: Not One Less, “ in Law, Border Crossings, 106–109; Kinnia Yau, “Interview with Umetsugu Inoue,” in Law, Border Crossings, 144–147. See as well the biographical entries in Wong, The Shaw Screen, 318–319, 325–328, 336–337.
8 : Quoted in Law Kar, Kinnia Yau Shuk-ting, and June Lam Pui-wah, “Transnational Collaborations and Activities of Shaw Brothers and Golden Harvest: An Interview with Chua Lam,” in Law, Border Crossings, 139.
9 : Interview with Charles Wang Cheung Tze, Hong Kong, November 2003, and email correspondence October 2006.
10 : On Dyaliscope, see Olivier Rousseau, “Les procédés anamorphiques français concurrent du CinemaScope (1953–1971),” in Le CinemaScope entre art et industrie, ed. Jean-Jacques Meusy (Paris: Association française de recherches sur l’histoire du cinéma, 2003), 111–112. See also Alain Monclin, Optique et prises de vues (Paris: FEMIS, 1994), 255.
11 : Interviews with Roy Wagner, ASC, Los Angeles, June 2005.
12 : “Put behind an off-the-shelf 10:1 zoom lens, they didn’t look too bad—it was probably the failings of the zoom lens that hid the shortcomings of the rear anamorphoser” (David Samuelson, “Golden Years,” American Cinematographer 84, 9 [September 2003], 76).
13 : Charles Wang Cheung Tze indicates that several Hong Kong filmmakers still used Kowa lenses after his firm, Salon Films, made anamorphic Panavision available. (Interview, November 2003.) Ramachandra Babu, a Malayam cinematographer, claims that Indian cinema continues to use Kowa anamorposers “in large numbers” (The History and Practice of Cinematography in India, 29 January 2004, p. 29, at www.sarai.net/cinematography/pdf/interviews).
14 : Edwin W. Chen, “Musical China, Classical Impressions: A Preliminary Study of Shaws’ Huangmei Diao Film,” in Wong, The Shaw Screen, 53–56.
15 : Wong Ain-ling, “Colour in Simplicity: On the Wenyi Films of Shaws,” in Wong, The Shaw Screen, 192, 204.
16 : Yung Sai-shing, “From The Love Parade to My Kingdom for a Husband: Hollywood Musicals and Cantonese Opera Films of the 1950s,” in Wong, The Cathay Story, 193–198; see also Michael Lam, “Strangers in Paradise,” in Wong, The Cathay Story, 200–212.
17 : For a comparison with visual style in early U.S. CinemaScope, see my essay, “CinemaScope: The Modern Miracle You See without Glasses,” in Poetics of Cinema (New York: Routledge, 2008), 281–325.
18 : Silas Lee, “Interview with He Lanshan,” in A Study of Hong Kong Cinema in the 1970s, ed. Li Cheuk-to (Hong Kong: Urban Council/ Hong Kong International Film Festival, 1984), 121–122.
19 : David Bordwell, Figures Traced in Light: On Cinematic Staging (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2005), 83–139.
20 : Law Kar, “The Origin and Development of Shaws’ Colour Century,” in Wong, The Shaw Screen, 129.
21 : Law, “Origin and Development,” 130–132.
22 : See my “Richness through Imperfection: King Hu and the Glimpse,” inThe Cinema of HongKong: History, Arts, Identity, ed. David Desser and Poshek Fu (Cambridge University Press, 2000), pp. 113–136.
23 : Chang Cheh, A Memoir, ed. Wong Ain-ling, Kwok Ching-ling, and May Ng (Hong Kong: Hong Kong Film Archive, 2004), 82.
24 : Chang, A Memoir, 86.
25 : According to Lau Kar-leung, he and Tong Kai saw wirework in the Japanese film The Bloody Shuriken (Akai shuriken, 1965) and decided to use it on The Jade Bow. “Interview with Lau Kar-leung: We Always Had Kung Fu,” in A Tribute to Action Choreographers, ed. Li Cheuk-to (Hong Kong: Hong Kong International Film Festival, 2006), 61.
26 : See my “Aesthetics in Action: Kung Fu, Gunplay, and Cinematic Expressivity,” in At Full Speed: Hong Kong Cinema in a Borderless World, ed. Esther C. M. Yau (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2001), pp. 73–93. I make the case at greater length in Planet Hong Kong: Popular Cinema and the Art of Entertainment (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2000), 199–260.
27 : See Bordwell, “Richness through Imperfection,” 113–136; Planet Hong Kong, 254–260.
28 : See the Kill Bill screenplay available at <www.fexon.com/screenplay.php?action=download&scid=14>, p. 24 of pdf file.
29 : For background on Escort over Tiger Hills see Stephen Teo, “Cathay and the Wuxia Movie,” in Wong, The Cathay Story, 108–121.
30 : His last film, however, was for Shaws: Super Inframan (1975).
31 : In the 1980s and 1990s Shaws continued to release occasional quasi-independent productions, often under the Cosmopolitan brand.
32 : Elsewhere on this site I discuss Hou Hsiao-hsien’s use of the wide format in his popular films of the early 1980s: www.davidbordwell.net/books/figures_intro.php?ss=4.
Friday has at last come and with it, Crazed Fruit! Before I jump into the brief analysis, I want to 1) discuss my experience watching this film as a spectator and 2) provide a rough sketch of the film’s narrative. [If you have not seen the film, but would like to, this eighty-six minute feature is not available for streaming on iTunes or Amazon, but is accessible on DVD from Netflix and may be streaming on Hulu. For those of a particular thriftiness, you may potentially find this film elsewhere and procure it by alternative means.] Here is a lovely and adorable English-subtitled trailer. Also, for a historical and cultural context, make sure you already perused yesterday’s post (“Read Me Tender”).
When I first viewed this film, I experienced a variety of emotions –
- Wow, this film is shot wonderfully, totally French New Wave
- I hate these characters, they are such self-absorbed a**holes
- Oh my god, what is happening
- Bros, am I right?
- This ending is insanity
- Crazed Fruit is freaking brilliant
- *slow claps in mind because you’re in a crowded room*
The film is at once breathtaking, bold, and bonkers to watch, and for the record, I highly recommend it. To the synopsis . . .
>>>>ATTENTION – TO AVOID SYNOPSIS, SCROLL UNTIL YOU SEE THE PICTURE.<<<<
The elder Natsu and his “Sun Tribe” are spending their summer in a middle-class coastal community – drinking, partying, and using and abusing a range of women. Enter the younger Haru, Natsu’s brother, unitiated into the Tribe. While Haru is naive and optimistic, Natsu and his gang (led by the biracial Frank) are cynical and nihilistic, in general philosophical rebellion against their parent’s and society’s expectations of and for them. Basically, they got the ennui real bad. Meanwhile, Haru keeps on encountering a beautiful woman, named Eri, and eventually starts a relationship with her, punctuated by scenes of extreme adolescent sexual tension. Upon meeting Eri at a party, Natsu finds he does not trust her seemingly innocent facade (although he is also attracted to her) and discovers her dark secret – she is married to an older American businessman and habitually has flings while he’s away, which is often. Threatening her to stay away from his brother, he engages in sexual blackmail: I won’t tell my brother you’re married if you also sleep with me, which she does. However, Eri sees Haru as the redemption of her younger, freer self and eventually they consummate the relationship, but Natsu has become increasingly obsessed with Eri. To win her away from his brother, Natsu “kidnaps” Eri on his boat (revealing the affair to Haru in the process). In the end, the jealousy, obsession and betrayal is too much – as relayed by the surprising voice of reason, Frank – and Haru runs down both Eri and his brother Natsu with his boat, murdering them in cold blood. THE END. H.A.G.S.
From left to right: Yujiro Ishihara as NATSU, Mie Kitehara as ERI, and Masahiko Tsugawa as Natsu’s younger brother HARU.
Crazed Fruit (writ. Shintaro Ishihara) was released in 1956 by Nikkatsu, the oldest major movie studio in Japan. Featuring the studio’s line-up of new, young stars, including Yujiro Ishihara, Masahiko Tsugawa, Mie Kitahara, and Masumi Okada, the film follows the destructive love triangle between two brothers, the older Natsu (Y. Ishihara) and younger Haru (Tsugawa), and a mysterious, beautiful young woman named Eri (Kitahara). Paired with (S.) Ishihara’s Season of the Sun (dir. Takumi Furukawa, 1956), Crazed Fruit is one of the inaugural films of the short-lived Sun Tribe movement (taiyo-zoku eiga), an artistic subculture which emerged in postwar Japan of the 1950s and 1960s, at the start of the Japanese New Wave. Utilizing unconventional stylistic techniques and controversial subject matter, Crazed Fruit explores themes resonant in contemporary Japan, specifically the intersection of conflicts between cultures, generations, and philosophical ideologies.
Note: Sorry, reader, more history – film history specifically – is required.
During World War II and the immediate postwar years, the Nikkatsu studio was reluctantly forced to merge with two weaker companies (Shinkō Kinema and Daiko) under Daiei Film, which resulted in the undervalued Nikkatsu ceasing actual film production.
In the postwar expansion of the nation’s film industry, Nikkatsu constructed a new production studio, with production officially re-commencing in 1954, marked by a creative and economic resurgence of the veteran studio (2007: Standish, 142-4). Consequently, due to the war and the merger, Nikkatsu was struggling to compete with the Big Four studios (Toho, Shochiku, Toei, and Daiei), and had essentially lost its individual identity. With the provocative Sun Tribe films, the studio, like the film’s characters and its corresponding subculture, is trying to forge a new identity in the postwar era, between generations, cultures, and ideologies.
Running concurrently with the French New Wave, the beginnings of the Japanese New Wave are visible in the visual style of Crazed Fruit. For those unfamiliar, the Japanese New Wave, very roughly, was a group of semi-connected filmmakers and films, originating from a trend towards creative experimentation and reflection in the 1960s. In direct confrontation of Classical filmmaking and filmmakers, these more avant-garde artists produced compelling and daring works, pushing formal (cinematography, editing), narrative (linearity, structure), and thematic boundaries, tackling taboo subject matter and navigating the trauma and aftermath of World War II on the Japanese psyche.
In the opening of Crazed Fruit, cinematographer Shigeyoshi Mine utilizes dolly and tracking shots and extreme close-ups, shifting from the blistering natural sunlight of the day scenes to the shadowy, humid darkness of the night scenes, to create a paradoxical aesthetic of highly-stylized cinéma vérité. Mine and editor Masanori Tsujii smash from fast-paced, kinetic editing with equally frenetic in-frame action (e.g. running, jumping, speed boating) to longer, languid shots of contemplation and internal conflict (e.g. laying in bed, on the shore, looking off-distance). Unlike other film genres or earlier Japanese cinema, Crazed Fruit focuses on directionless movement – speed and urgency without any tangible direction or destination – by doing away with older traditions of the consistently static camera, a reminder of the country’s gradual ambivalence and acceptance of new technology (from sound to color to widescreen). Furthermore, the subject matter, including the rejection of parental authority, adventurous, pre-marital sex, and images of apocalyptic and seductive violence, attempts to capture the painful and inescapable present, rather than providing a historical period or familiar structure through which to negotiate contemporary social anxieties.
The primary conflicts of Crazed Fruit occur on three levels – between older and younger generations, Western and Japanese culture, and pre-existing and emerging ideological expectations. The aforementioned stylistic differences are a visual representation of the shifts between different generations of studios, directors, and spectators.
The film’s characters, mostly youths, are placed in constant opposition to their parent’s generation. For example, in the house of Natsu and Haru, their mother wears a kimono and the dwelling’s architecture leans towards the traditional. In contrast, none of the younger girls in the film ever wears a kimono, and in fact, are often shown in various states of undress and engaging in flirtatious or overtly sexual behavior. Parents, in general, are noticeably absent from the lives of most of the characters, such as Frank (Okada), the half-white, half-Japanese “leader” of the Sun Tribe, whose parents are divorced and mostly missing throughout the film. The expectations of the older generation are ever-present in the Tribe’s rebellion: in an early scene, the thesis of the Tribe is expounded upon for the newer Haru, displayed in successive quick shots, cuts chopping at a breakneck speed, extreme and skewed close-ups, with overlapping dialogue. Blending fatalism and existential ennui, Crazed Fruit affects a nihilistic interpretation of the later-released Gidget (dir. Paul Wendkos, 1959). The Tribe’s apathetic declaration decries the conventional expectations of Japanese youth – school, work, marriage, and family – and, instead, the Tribe experiences an existential malaise, punctuated by sex, violence, adrenaline, and fleeting gratification in material and physical pleasures.
I wish I could find a clip, but here is the transcript for the Sun Tribe speech:
Natsu takes Haru to Frank’s house (parents absent) and the boys lay into Haru about his traditional view of the world. The metaphor for fish is constant, ugly women are “fish bait” while beautiful women are “big catches” and “mermaids;” and the ideals of the older generation are comparable to fragile tropical fish.
Boys #1 and #2: We’re just bored.
Haru: Then find something to do.
Boy #3: Like what?
Natsu: “Something” isn’t so easy to find. Intellectual high-minded talk isn’t worth a damn. The words may be pretty, but the ideas are as flimsy as those fish. Look at ’em. They’re fine now, but let the water get dirty or cold and they go belly-up.
Natsu (extreme-close tilted angle): Fancy words and old ways don’t cut it now. We need something with a fresh nip to it.
Boy #4 (extreme close-up): Listen to your professors, always spouting the same drivel. It was okay before, but it’s outdated nonsense now.
Boy #5 (extreme close-up): You know Tachikawa in economics? He said we were future captains of industry. You’d think he was narrating a silent movie. Chasing rainbows, with the Soviets and Red China next door.
Boy #4 (extreme close-up): And he’s considered a leading thinker.
Natsu (extreme-close tilted angle): Look what the older generation tries to sell us. You find anything exciting in that?
Boy #4 (extreme close-up): I’d given up trying. We’ll find our own way to live.
Haru: And this is it? Aimlessly killing time?
Natsu (extreme-close tilted angle from opposite side): We do the best we can.
Haru: It’s all just a bunch of bullshit. You guys have no idea what you want to do. That’s why you’re always so bored. They call people like you the Sun Tribe. I’m not gonna live like that.
Natsu (extreme-close tilted angle): What do you say we should do?
Haru: Well . . .
Natsu (extreme-close tilted angle): There’s nothing to throw ourselves into even if we wanted.
Girl (extreme-close tilted angle): We live in boring times.
Natsu (extreme-close tilted angle): Exactly. So we make boredom our credo. Eventually something will come of it.
Girl (extreme close-up): Exactly. Anybody hungry?
On the line between childhood and adulthood, the adolescents also straddle the fading divide between traditional Japanese culture and the economic and cultural domination of American products.
Crazed Fruit features many visual, narrative, and thematic allusions to similar expressions of youth culture occurring contemporaneously in Hollywood cinema, exemplified in The Wild One (dir. László Benedek, 1953), Rebel without a Cause (dir. Nicholas Ray, 1955), and The Blackboard Jungle (dir. Richard Brooks, 1955). Both film movements focus on the immediate present, youth protagonists, and the volatile and rebellious interiority of the postwar generation. In a more ominous connection, James Dean died in a fatal car accident, in 1955, at the age of 24, while speedily driving down a California highway, a comparable message is found in the ending of Crazed Fruit, as Haru violently runs down his brother and Eri with a speedboat – live fast and die young. The presence of American and Western culture is pervasive throughout the film. More subtle examples include the visibility of English-language signs and brief uses of English by the characters, as well as the use of American jazz music in the background and the Elvis Presley-inspired musical persona of Natsu. However, more prominently, Crazed Fruit displays an evolving Japanese modernity equally predicated on materialism and consumerism, amassing houses, cars, summer getaways, and plenty of free-flowing money to give their reckless and emboldened youths, who don requisite Hawaiian shirts and sports jackets. Furthermore, the appearance of interracial relationships, such as between Eri and her unnamed middle-aged American husband (Harold Conway), also visualize American domination over Japan, through military occupation, cultural invasion, and additionally, via Japanese women.
In conclusion, Crazed Fruit cinematically manifests the generational, cultural, and ideological conflicts of the postwar youth generation, exemplified at-large in the brief, provocative, and influential Sun Tribe movement.
That ends this week’s post, but please return for next Friday’s analysis of Masayuki Suo’s international cinematic hit Shall We Dance? (1996). And no, not the one with Richard Gere doing the tango with J. Lo in a dark, deserted ballroom, but the original, before the uber-masculine white collar corporate culture of America got its remaking-dance shoes stuck in its mouth.
- Blackboard Jungle, The. Dir. Richard Brooks. Perf. Glenn Ford, Sidney Poitier, Vic Morrow, Anne Francis and Louis Calhern. MGM, 1955. Film.
- Crazed Fruit. Dir. Kō Nakahira. Perf. Yujiro Ishihara, Mie Kitahara, Masahiko Tsugawa and Masumi Okada. Nikkatsu, 1956. Film.
- Gidget. Dir. Paul Wendkos. Perf. Sandra Dee, James Darren and Cliff Robertson. Columbia, 1959. Film.
- Rebel without a Cause. Dir. Nicholas Ray. Perf. James Dean, Natalie Wood and Sal Mineo. Warner Bros., 1955. Film.
- Standish, Isolde. “Cinema and the State.” A New History of Japanese Cinema: A Century of Narrative Film. NY: Continuum International Publishing, 2006, pp. 142-4. Print
- Wild One, The. Dir. László Benedek. Perf. Marlon Brando, Mary Murphy and Robert Keith. Columbia, 1953. Film.